nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.14 1-9
利用ICEEMDAN-LSTM的台风登陆期间电离层TEC扰动探测
基金项目(Foundation): 广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2022KY0418); 广西壮族自治区级大学生创新训练项目(s202311607223)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16547/j.cnki.10-1096.20260201
摘要:

针对台风电离层异常扰动探测参考背景值的精度直接影响探测结果的准确性,而传统方法确定背景值的精度较低的问题,提出一种台风登陆期间电离层TEC扰动探测方法:结合改进的自适应噪声完备集合经验模态分解(ICEEMDAN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)神经网络构建短时电离层总电子含量(TEC)背景值的确定方法;然后将其用于2023年台风“苏拉”登陆期间电离层TEC异常扰动探测。结果表明:1)ICEEMDAN-LSTM模型在地磁活跃期和平静期确定背景值的相对精度分别为91.18%和93.10%,较四分位距法、LSTM模型和CEEMDAN-LSTM模型可提高0.58~60.35个百分点;而均方根误差和偏差则减小数倍;ICEEMDAN-LSTM模型确定背景值的精度显著高于四分位距法和单一的LSTM模型。2)将提出的方法用于2023年台风“苏拉”登陆期间的电离层TEC扰动探测,发现台风登陆点周围的4个格网点电离层TEC在登陆当天和登陆后第1天分别表现出负异常和正负异常现象;结合日地空间环境,台风登陆当天的电离层扰动与“苏拉”存在一定联系,且距离台风路径越近,电离层TEC扰动越显著。

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem that the accuracy of reference background values for detecting anomalous disturbances in typhoon ionosphere directly affects the accuracy of detection results, while the accuracy of determining background values using traditional methods is relatively low, the paper proposed a detection method of ionospheric TEC disturbance during strong typhoon landfall: the improved complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise(ICEEMDAN) and the long short-term memory(LSTM) neutral networks were combined to construct the method for determining the background values of short-term ionospheric total electron content(TEC); then the method was applied in the detection of ionospheric TEC abnormal disturbances during the landing of Typhoon SAOLA in 2023. Results showed that: 1) The relative accuracy of the ICEEMDANLSTM model in determining background values during geomagnetic active and geomagnetic quiet periods would be 91.18% and 93.10%, respectively, which could be increased by 0.58 to 60.35 percentage points compared with the interquartile range, LSTM model and CEEMDAN-LSTM model; meanwhile, compared to the interquartile range, LSTM model and CEEMDAN-LSTM model, the root mean square error and bias of background values by the ICEEMDAN-LSTM model would be reduced several times; results indicated that the accuracy of the ICEEMDAN-LSTM model in determining background values could be significantly higher than that of interquartile range and a single LSTM model. 2) The proposed method was applied to detect the ionospheric TEC disturbance during the landfall of Typhoon SAOLA in 2023, and it was found that four grid points around the landfall point would exhibit negative and positive/negative anomalies on the day of landfall and the first day after landfall, respectively; combining the spatial environment of solar activity and geomagnetic activity, results indicated that there would be a certain connection between ionospheric disturbances on the day of typhoon landfall and Typhoon SAOLA; moreover, the closer to the typhoon path, the more significant the disturbance of the ionosphere TEC.

参考文献

[1]SOJKA J J, RAITT W J, SCHUNK R W. Theoretical predictions for ion composition in the high-latitude winter Fregion for solar minimum and low magnetic activity[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1981,86(A4):2206-2216.

[2]LI Wang, YUE Jianping, YANG Yang, et al. Analysis of ionospheric disturbances associated with powerful cyclones in East Asia and North America[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2017, 161:43-54.

[3]CHUM J, LIU J Y, PODOLSKÁK, et al. Infrasound in the ionosphere from earthquakes and typhoons[J]. Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics, 2018, 171:72-82.

[4]HUANG Y N, CHENG K, CHEN S W. On the detection of acoustic-gravity waves generated by typhoon by use of real time HF Doppler frequency shift sounding system[J]. Radio science, 1985, 20(4):897-906.

[5]ZHAO Qingzhi, YAO Yibin, YAO Wanqiang, et al. Real-time precise point positioning-based zenith tropospheric delay for precipitation forecasting[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):1-12.

[6]毛田,王劲松,杨光林,等.台风“麦莎”对电离层TEC的影响[J].科学通报, 2009, 54(24):3858-3863.

[7]许九靖,柯福阳,赵兴旺.基于地基GPS研究台风引起电离层TEC的变化特征[J].全球定位系统, 2018,43(6):98-104.

[8]孙佳龙,龙冰心,秦思远,等.台风“鲶鱼”期间电离层TEC变化异常分析[J].地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(3):936-943.

[9]袁建刚,李旺,岳建平,等.台风“尼伯特”的电离层扰动分析[J].测绘科学, 2019, 44(3):63-69.

[10]齐小嫚,柯福阳.不同地形条件下台风对电离层TEC的影响[J].测绘科学技术学报, 2019, 36(4):353-358,363.

[11]CHEN Jun, ZHANG Xiaohong, REN Xiaodong, et al. Ionospheric disturbances detected during a typhoon based on GNSS phase observations:A case study for typhoon Mangkhut over Hong Kong[J]. Advances in Space Research,2020, 66(7):1743-1753.

[12]宋福成,时爽爽,史云飞,等.基于IGS数据分析台风“利奇马”引起的电离层TEC扰动[J].全球定位系统,2020, 45(3):83-88.

[13]方佳辰,罗孝文,王国成,等.标准时频变换的台风期间电离层TEC异常分析[J].测绘科学, 2023, 48(4):79-87.

[14]YU Shiwei, LIU Zhizhao, LEE T C. Ionospheric disturbances observed from a single GPS station in Hong Kong during the passage of super typhoon Hato in 2017[J]. Space Weather, 2022, 20(1):e2021SW002850.

[15]吴梦瑶,李仲勤,张瑞鹏,等. 2004号台风“黑格比”路径电离层TEC的异常分析[J].导航定位学报, 2021, 9(3):104-110.

[16]符俊贤.利用GNSS监测台风电离层扰动特征与规律研究[D].南京:南京信息工程大学, 2023.

[17]LI W, YUE J, YANG Y, et al. Preliminary analysis of ionospheric disturbances associated with powerful cyclones in East Asia and North America[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2017, 161:43-54..

[18]张小红,任晓东,吴风波,等.震前电离层TEC异常探测新方法[J].地球物理学报, 2013, 56(2):441-449.

[19]黄文喜,祝芙英,翟笃林,等. BP神经网络和ARMA模型在中纬度TEC短期预测中的对比分析[J].大地测量与地球动力学, 2021, 41(3):262-267.

[20]陆建华,王斌,胡伍生.利用BP神经网络改进电离层短期预报模型[J].测绘科学技术学报, 2017, 34(1):1-4.

[21]熊波,李肖霖,王宇晴,等.基于长短时记忆神经网络的中国地区电离层TEC预测[J].地球物理学报, 2022,65(7):2365-2377.

[22]王建敏,刘志鹏,黄佳鹏,等.利用VMD-SSA-LSTM的电离层总电子含量预报研究[J].导航定位学报, 2024,12(3):88-101.

[23]杨迪,王辉,贺仁杰,等.基于改进经验模态分解和混合深度学习模型的风速预测[J].智慧电力, 2024, 52(1):1-7.

[24]陈帅,刘伟,时光,等.桥梁动态变形GNSS-PPK监测信号降噪方法研究[J].测绘科学, 2024, 49(8):9-15.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16547/j.cnki.10-1096.20260201

中图分类号:P352.7;P444

引用信息:

[1]杨芸珍,刘立龙,韩青宏,等.利用ICEEMDAN-LSTM的台风登陆期间电离层TEC扰动探测[J].导航定位学报,2026,14(02):1-9.DOI:10.16547/j.cnki.10-1096.20260201.

基金信息:

广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2022KY0418); 广西壮族自治区级大学生创新训练项目(s202311607223)

投稿时间:

2025-03-07

投稿日期(年):

2025

终审时间:

2025-05-23

终审日期(年):

2025

修回时间:

2025-05-21

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2025-09-29

出版时间:

2025-09-29

网络发布时间:

2025-09-29

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索